Search for: "Shell v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Shell Oil Co., 180 F. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:29 am
California is the only state to have a state-wide green building code, CALGREEN, which went into effect on January 1, 2011. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:55 am
In Universal Cable Productions LLC, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 8:29 am
Scollick v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:55 am
In Universal Cable Productions LLC, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
The plaintiff’s motion hadn’t done that, the court found; the plaintiff had merely filed a “shell” motion, and if a shell motion was sufficient to block Barber mootness, then Barber means nothing. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 5:37 am
§ 1983 and various state-law tort claims. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 4:20 am
Compare such honesty with the shell game played currently in many states where the sentence publicly imposed means little or nothing. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
The court will revisit the issue Oct. 10, when it is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 1:31 pm
This 2018 case against Shell and other oil companies alleges state tort claims. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 10:38 am
, United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
Coupled with Judge Posner's recent opinion in Parko v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:42 pm
Juan Ramon Meza Segundo v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Kozel v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:05 pm
In Griffin v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
