Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:43 pm by Glenn
A colleague of mine, whose views on this topic differ, suggested in a debate recently that United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:19 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Eastern District, Sherman Division issued an opinion in July 2012, that deals with claim value determination. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:43 am by Sheppard Mullin
A Sherman I claim or a series of claims, would have been aided, arguably, by the concept of “quantitative substantiality”, as recognized in the venerable 1949 Standard Stations case, and more recently in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:29 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A federal judge must still approve the proposal, but three ebook publishers have offered to kick in a total of  $69 million to settle an antitrust suit that alleges they attempted to fix ebook prices.Attorneys general of 54 states and the District of Columbia filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
(“Teva”) violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act by delaying EFFEXOR XR generic competition. [read post]
Simon Property Group Inc. alleges that Simon, the largest public real estate company in the United States, and a major force in shopping malls, violated the Sherman Act’s prohibitions against monopolization and unreasonable restraints of trade. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; Polonetsky v Better Homes Depot, 97 NY2d 46, 54; Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201; Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180, 1180-1181; Reid v Gateway Sherman, Inc., 60 AD3d 836, 837; Roth v Goldman, 254 AD2d 405, 406), the complaint adequately stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice by alleging that during its… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]