Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 2,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 19 F.3d 562, 566-67 (11th Cir.1994)); see also United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:44 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
There is no denying the space program in the United States is not like it once was. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:44 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
There is no denying the space program in the United States is not like it once was. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:51 pm
Hodges, the United States Supreme Court ruled that state-level bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:06 am by Lou M
The generals are, respectively, the Superintendent and Commandant of the United States Military Academy at West Point. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
 http://katzjustice.com  Six weeks after my birth, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark opinion of Brady v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“SEL”) appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing SEL’s complaint with prejudice pursuant to Fed. [read post]
Right to a Remedy in the US In Ms Costello’s view, “the arguments of the DPC that the laws – and indeed the practices – of the United States do not respect the essence of the right to an effective remedy before an independent tribunal guaranteed by Article 47 of the Charter, which applies to data of all EU data subjects transferred to the United States, are well-founded” (Paragraph 294). [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 1:37 pm
JCTG's opinion is scholarly, and relies upon the courts of the sister services as well as decisions from state supreme courts:"We adopt the holding of the Stanley court that an accused is not shielded from a voluntary manslaughter charge when artificially administered ventilation is withdrawn as part of a foreseeable, well-reasoned medical decision based upon what is considered of greatest benefit to the victim. 60 M.J. at 628. [read post]