Search for: "Short v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 19,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 12:11 pm
S873 (Mar 21, 2011): United States Supreme Court per curiam decision – This is a very short USSCt case so no worries having to read it. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm
The death of the death penalty was short lived. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:59 pm
The Supreme Court granted cert. in the SAF case, McDonald v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:44 pm
The North Carolina legislature enacted the law in the wake of the Court’s 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:25 pm
Nothing in Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:30 am
Nothing in Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 10:05 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 9:00 pm
State, 990 P.2d 476, 484 (Wyo. 1999) (citing Dworkin v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 2:16 am
Bidish Sarma has written a short article at the Yale Journal Pocket Part about the legacy of the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 7:29 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:32 pm
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Cutler v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:13 pm
In Berger v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
And while you ponder sugar plums, mulled cider, and crackling fires, we’ll update you on a recent federal decision that refused to recognize an expansion of state products liability law – Baird v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:37 am
Recently Medtronic recalled over 37,000 pacemakers due to defects in the wiring which may cause the pacemaker to short circuit. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:16 am
At the very end of December, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the validity of Spano’s order (the short decision can be found at 2008 N.Y. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:01 pm
That first VLSI v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:29 pm
SEC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:42 am
In short, the Loper decision will be just one more tool hostile judges can use to undermine the administrative state and regulations and rule makings with which they disagree. [read post]
