Search for: "South Carolina v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2013, 6:42 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:30 am
He ordered five states — Arizona, California, Georgia, South Carolina and Tennessee — and any others with stocks of the barbiturate to surrender them to the FDA. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:17 am
But in South Carolina, fewer than 3 percent can. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
United States, and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
Amnesty identifies nine states – Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Ohio, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming – alongside Washington DC where no law enforcement officer lethal force statutes exist. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:52 am
Title: State of South Carolina v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am
Jeremy received his J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law in 2012 and received a B.A. from the University of South Carolina where he studied political science. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 2:40 am
In 1777, the Executive Council of Georgia authorized the purchase of needed supplies from a South Carolina businessman. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:40 am
In 1777, the Executive Council of Georgia authorized the purchase of needed supplies from a South Carolina businessman. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
South Carolina – South Carolina Senate Postpones Vote on Ethics Compromise after House Grudgingly Passes Columbus Republic – Andrew Coffman Smith (Associated Press) | Published: 6/5/2014 The South Carolina General Assembly was on the cusp of passing its first attempt at ethics reform in 20 years when Sen. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
TRADE Washington, D.C. : Inside Washington Publishers, c1983- See Catalog Commercial policy -- Environmental aspects -- Case studies TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT : LAW AND POLICY / CHRIS WOLD, SANFORD GAINES, GREG BLOCK Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2005 K3943 .W648 2005 See Catalog Common law -- United States -- History COMMON LAW, HISTORY, AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA, 1790-1900 / KUNAL M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
TRADE Washington, D.C. : Inside Washington Publishers, c1983- See Catalog Commercial policy -- Environmental aspects -- Case studies TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT : LAW AND POLICY / CHRIS WOLD, SANFORD GAINES, GREG BLOCK Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2005 K3943 .W648 2005 See Catalog Common law -- United States -- History COMMON LAW, HISTORY, AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA, 1790-1900 / KUNAL M. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
South Carolina (2002) -- capital defendant's due process right to inform jury of his parole ineligibilityFEC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 4:30 pm
Dewberry Engineers provides its services through affiliated entities under common ownership and control to clients all over the United States—Georgia, Virginia, Florida, and South Carolina in particular. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:09 pm
* * *The civil settlement includes the resolution of claims against Wise brought under the False Claims Act by the United States in the case captioned United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
District Court for the District of South Carolina: U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Eric Williams, George Sochan, Bowie State University COMMENTS: Nancy Ellenberger, United States Naval Academy RED, WHITE, AND BLACK: CONSTRUCTING NINETEENTH-CENTURY RACIAL IDENTITIESPRESIDING: Amy Dru Stanley, University of Chicago Unintended Consequences: Restricting Notions of Whiteness in Maryland during the Early National Period, Patricia A. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
Chamber of Commerce's lawsuit against the NLRB, Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
