Search for: "Spalding "
Results 581 - 600
of 1,095
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2011, 5:32 pm
Adler) The BLT Blog notes a story in The Daily Report (for subscribers only) that suggests the flap over King & Spalding’s on-and-off representation of the House of Representatives in DOMA litigation was due to a misunderstanding about the firm’s internal vetting process. [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:24 pm
[WSJ Law Blog]* I hope there are enough swords for King & Spalding managers to fall on. [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:19 pm
More explanations from King & Spalding about the bungled DOMA matter. [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:42 am
$11,100 to Hillary Clinton $10,000 to the New Jersey Democratic State Committee $4,600 to Barack Obama $2,000 to Charles Schumer Law Blog reports that bigtime lawyers opine that: Andrew Hruska, a partner at King & Spalding and former lawyer with the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, said that it is very difficult for a defendant to overcome wiretap evidence. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:53 am
“King & Spalding is a corporate law firm — not a constitutional firm. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:13 am
Andrew Hruska, a partner at King & Spalding and former lawyer with the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, said that it is very difficult for a defendant to overcome wiretap evidence. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:28 pm
Crisis communication expert Bob Witeck talks offers tips on how King & Spalding can bounce back after its DOMA mess. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:00 am
The firm will open a Russian base on May 23 with White & Case oil and gas head Jennifer Josefson and a three-partner team from the Moscow office of Hogan Lovells. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:26 am
"King & Spalding's Reversal of Fortune": Steven Harper has this guest post at "The Am Law Daily" blog. [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:19 am
Yes. [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:57 am
The law firm dropping the DOMA defense continues to experience criticism. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:29 pm
What should have been a nonevent became a major story because the firm said yes to former partner Paul Clement's representation of House Republicans in Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) litigation--and then it said no. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:55 am
In contrast to a lot of commentators, she argues that King & Spalding should not be criticized for its decision to withdraw from defending DOMA in light of the moral issues that are at stake. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:09 am
[WSJ Law Blog]* In the wake of the King & Spalding mess, a look at how other law firms vet controversial clients. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:20 pm
In light of the recent King & Spalding debacle, a few Am Law 200 firms explain their intake process for controversial clients. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:32 am
A firm the size of King & Spalding certainly cannot. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:21 pm
” [Slate]* People are making a big deal by about all the clients leaving King & Spalding in the wake of the firm dropping DOMA defense. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:58 pm
Andrew Brady Spalding (Chicago-Kent College of Law) has posted The Irony of International Business Law: U.S. [read post]
2 May 2011, 11:28 am
I think I'm the only blogger here who hasn't posted something about the King & Spalding case, although I've commented on several other posts, but I just found my angle: The National Rifle Association is dropping King & Spalding as its outside counsel because King & Spalding had dropped the House of Representatives in the DOMA litigation (h/t TPM). [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:20 am
” He said the NRA hired King & Spalding and Clement to represent it in the Supreme Court case McDonald v. [read post]
