Search for: "Spanish v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 1,327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Case C-484/14 McFadden is a reference for a preliminary ruling from CJEU-loving Member State Germany, seeking clarification as regards the liability of a freely-accessible wi-fi provider for third-party copyright infringements committed via that wireless network. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:19 pm by David Lat
The State responded by issuing a birth certificate without any designation as to race or Spanish origin. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:00 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaBrothers who believe they were libeled by a 2007 documentary may pursue their defamation action, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled last week, but will have to satisfy the elevated burden of proof of actual malice to prevail, according to The Docket, a blog produced by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly newspaper.The case, Felipe Vicini Lluberes & Juan Vicini Lluberes v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:24 am by Karen Hoffmann
  She was the lead CJA attorney on the Yousuf v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:34 am by Nabiha Syed
” The Florida Independent reports on Spanish-language media commentary on Arizona v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:44 am
A little bit of soon-to-be-forgotten history was made today when the European Union's General Court handed down its first decision on Community design law in a dispute involving PepsiCo and a Spanish manufacturer of promotional items. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:01 am
On this day in ...... 1987, in RWDSU v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:13 am
Well, the courts saw it Uphold Our Heritage's way and the state Supreme Court refused to take an appeal in April. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:16 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On December 22nd, the European Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Joseba Andoni Aguirre Zarraga v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
Consider the case constantly referred to in decisions this year by courts at both the state and federal level: Jacobson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
An obligation to state the date or the day does not imply, according to the ordinary meaning, that it is necessary to state the hour and, a fortiori, the minute. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:53 am
Professor Cato interprets these Supreme Court decisions, especially the seminal Matthews v. [read post]