Search for: "Specter v. Specter"
Results 581 - 600
of 953
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
” In reaching this latter conclusoin, Judge Sullivan rejected the applicability of the 1928 Zeig v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
(That’s what happened in US v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:26 pm
Shionogi Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:57 am
Times v.] [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:47 pm
I posted yesterday on Winston v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
As Ramirez v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:56 am
People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:56 am
People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:02 am
Galeski v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Moreover, these interests raise the specter that they are not legitimate because they are based on animus or the desire to harm a politically unpopular group of gay men and lesbians. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
By way of a reminder, however, to obtain a preliminary injunction, Louboutin must have established (1) irreparable harm and (2) either (a) likelihood of success on the merits, or (b) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits of its claims to make them fair ground for litigation, plus a balance of the hardships tipping decidedly in [its favor] (Monserrate v New York State Senate (2010)). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:16 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:08 pm
Carter held Thursday in Mattel v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:53 pm
For example, last year, at the candidates’ lounge, I found three faculty hopefuls debating Bush v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:25 am
See Campbell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
"The Fox Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
Back in 1998, in State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
