Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer " Results 581 - 600 of 1,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am by David Fraser
[Note: this post is a work in progress, and will be updated as I digest the decision.]This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43.The case, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada, has finally provided some certainty regarding the expectation of privacy that all Canadians enjoy in their online activities. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:19 am by David Fraser
As I blogged yesterday, the Supreme Court of Canada has announced that it will release its decision in the appeal from Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in R v Spencer, 2011 SKCA 144. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
  Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm by David Fraser
SCC Cases (Lexum) - Judgments to be Rendered in Appeals: 34644 Matthew David Spencer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
Hyperlinks to protected works made freely available on the internet do not infringe the copyright subsisting in the protected works, unless the hyperlink gives users a method by which they can circumvent access restrictions to the work (e.g. subscription access), because then the work is being made available to a new public, i.e. consumers not considered by the copyright holder.After referring those of us keen to understand the distinction between trade evidence and expert evidence to the Rihanna… [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Before you huff and puff about the iniquity of it all, bear in mind that you lot (landlords) had the section 21 decision of Spencer v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:19 pm by David Fraser
(We'll see what the Supreme Court of Canada ultimately has to say about this practice in R v Spencer heard in December of last year.) [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:40 am by Spencer L. Reames
  The respective objections raised multiple theories for rejection of, and affirmative defenses against, the charity’s claim including (i) forgery of the decedent’s signature, (ii) lack of due execution, (iii) lack of consideration, (iv) lapse upon the decedent’s death, (v) laches and unclean hands, (vi) expiration of the statute of limitations, (vii) fraudulent inducement, and (viii) the decedent’s lack of capacity. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:37 pm by Tessa Shepperson
We also talk a bit about the Court of Appeal decision in the case of Spencer v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:15 am by Ritika Singh
Hearings at Guantanamo Bay on United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:21 pm by Colin O'Keefe
As we roll into the weekend, the Supreme Court’s big campaign finance ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
[xxv] See Spencer, Arbitration, Class Waivers, and Statutory Rights, at1012 (citing Kaltwasser v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]