Search for: "Starr v. Starr" Results 581 - 600 of 923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Residential Project Exempt From CEQA Review Under Government Code Section 65457 As Consistent With Specific Plan For Which Program EIR Previously Certified; First District Also Holds New GHG Thresholds Do Not Constitute “New Information” Requiring Supplemental EIR For Specific Plan
10 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Concerned Dublin Citizens, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Remedies Statute Does Not Authorize Appellate Court To Issue Writ And Supervise Compliance On Direct Appeal, Holds Second District In Partially Published Decision On Remand In Newhall Ranch Case
13 Jul 2016, 3:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Dividing Up Liability Among Defendants in Indiana Personal Injury Cases
11 Aug 2016, 8:27 am by Parr Richey Obremskey Frandsen & Patterson
Cramer v. [read post]
Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.indianainjuryblog.com/
Not Giving Employees Something (Namely a Discrimination Complaint) To Talk About
8 Sep 2017, 6:32 am by Daniel Schwartz
My colleague, Gary Starr, shares more: A recent Connecticut district court decision (EEOC v. [read post]
Connecticut Employment Law Blog - http://www.ctemploymentlawblog.com/
Thomas departs the planet.
24 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
 - U.S. v. [read post]
Underdog Blog - http://katzjustice.com/underdog/
Thursday round-up
23 Aug 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Susan Collins of Maine that Roe v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
What You Should Know About Non-Compete Agreements in Your Industry
22 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by Leiza Dolghih
According to this study, the chances of being bound a non-compete increase with the higher level of education – 9% without college degree v. [read post]
North Texas Legal News - http://northtexaslegalnews.com/
Dividing Up Liability Among Defendants in Indiana Personal Injury Cases
11 Aug 2016, 8:27 am by Parr Richey Obremskey Frandsen & Patterson
Cramer v. [read post]
Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.indianainjuryblog.com/
An Early Christmas Present: Corp Fin's Regulation S-K Study
23 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Broc Romanek
Wachtell Lipton v. [read post]
TheCorporateCounsel.net Blog - http://www.thecorporatecounsel.net/Blog/
The Unitary Executive & The Justice Department Eight
8 Mar 2007, 4:15 pm
Although the Supreme Court rejected the strong form of this argument in the 1988 independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
The Facebook Posts, Cyberstalking and "Substantial Emotional Distress"
20 May 2015, 4:58 am
The first post contained the lyrics to Atlantic Starr's 1985 single `Secret Lovers. [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
Fourth District Affirms Judgment Rejecting Numerous CEQA Challenges to EIR and Approval Process for Large Master-Planned Riverside County Development Project
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Residents Against Specific Plan 380 v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sacramento Residential Infill Project EIR Violated CEQA By Basing Less-Than-Significant Traffic Impact Finding Solely On Compliance With General Plan Policy Allowing LOS F
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
” (Quoting County of Inyo v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
What’s Up in the 8th
16 May 2012, 3:52 am by Russ Bensing
  In State v. [read post]
The Briefcase - http://briefcase8.com
Fourth District Rejects Coastal Act/CEQA-Based Challenges To Commission’s Certification of San Diego Port Plan Amendment As Time-Barred For Failure To Join Indispensable Parties Within Limitations Period
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Kuhn v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
California Supreme Court Rules that Ordinance Intended to Increase Number of Affordable Housing Units is a Lawful Exercise of the Police Power
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by Bryan W. Wenter and Ronny Clausner
Industry Ass’n v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Back To CEQA Basics: Second District Teaches That CEQA Requires Judicial Deference To Lead Agency’s Chosen Baseline, Failure To Administratively Exhaust “Exact Issue” Results In Forfeiture, And An EIR Is Not Faulty For Omitting Immaterial Information
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Mixed-Use “Mix and Match” Upheld: Second District Holds Stable Project Description Requirement Does Not Mean Ultimately Approved Version of Revised Mixed Use Project Must Match An Alternative Analyzed In EIR, And New Project Alternative Added to FEIR Does Not Require Recirculation
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Per the Court, those cases are: (1) County of Inyo v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
May Supreme Court census argument would be unusual but not unprecedented
12 Feb 2019, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
United States in 1998, a case about attorney-client privilege related to the Starr investigation. [read post]
Constitution Daily - http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/
Tuesday round-up
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/