Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 13,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 8:00 am
Citibank, N.A., the Court will decide whether the Broughton-Cruz rule survives the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 8:19-cv-01582 […] [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 8:19-cv-01582 […] [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
United States District Court for the Northern District of California Case No. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:52 pm
In the Northern District of California, the court in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:41 pm
Iron Maiden Holdings Ltd. v. 3D Realms Entertainment ApS Complaint Filed May 28, 2019 United States District Court Central District of California On May 28, 2019, the band Iron Maiden, […] [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 6:48 am
Ltd. and uCool, Inc., United States District Court of the Northern District of California, […] [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
United States District Court for the Northern District of California Case […] [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:09 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Cunningham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
Matthew Storman and John Does 1-10 United States District Court for the Central District of California Filed September 10, 2019 […] [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:00 am
Case No. 2:19-cv-00608 United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division […] [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 1:10 pm
Matthew Storman United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:28 pm
On January 5, 2016, the California Supreme Court, at the request of the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals, heard oral argument in two cases alleging that the employers failed to provide seating to their employees as required by California law. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
In other words, if antitrust is indeed the “magna carta” of American free enterprise (see United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:19 am
So, the California Supreme Court just issued the following order:In light of the United States Supreme Court's order vacating our judgment in the above-entitled case and remanding the cause to this court "for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
On that same date, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark Windsor v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:15 am
United States, 179 F.3d 29, 35 (1999), but says it has been undercut by Murphy v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided Fernandez v. [read post]
