Search for: "State of Me. v. Thomas"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
Professor Velte’s post draws on arguments in an amicus brief that she authored, submitted in Fulton on behalf of respondents and joined by several legal scholars (including me). [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
” It also stated that the “venerable mansion which he erected 120 years ago is still standing in a state of good preservation. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
Franklin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
Like I said, this one is an easy victory for me. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 10:58 am
To me, it was striking that there was little discussion of the "special solicitude" on standing issues that the Supreme Court held applies to state governments in Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
Fordice (1992) (Thomas, J., concurring)). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:10 am
The panel majority also rejected Mckesson's argument that NAACP v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
United States, 20-5758Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should revisit and recede from its decision in Deal v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:27 am
Until this week, only Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for himself, had ever invoked any aspect of Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Gore litigation—Chief Justice William Rehnquist joined by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas—that is the modern font of this notion that elected state legislatures are protected from interference by other state bodies with regard to regulation of federal elections. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
The confirmation process has made ever clearer to me one of the fundamental differences between the federal judiciary and the United States Senate. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
The confirmation process has made ever clearer to me one of the fundamental differences between the federal judiciary and the United States Senate. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
In parts of the United States, back alley abortions would then have remained common, and lunch counters segregated.But to Republicans today, defeating Bork was the original sin. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:21 pm
But reading Judge Thomas Zill's careful opinion has led me to reconsider. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Writing in dissent, Judge Thomas Durkin wrote that Alvarenga-Flores’s overall narrative had remained c [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
Madrid and Pereida v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm
Kennedy, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, this year I also assigned two other readings: a 1998 article co-written by Amy V. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:05 am
That reasoning strikes me as sound. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:57 pm
And it would avoid what strikes me as the harder question whether the state could impose greater requirements on people who want to foster children with whom they have no prior relationship. [read post]
