Search for: "State of Michigan Judicial Court" Results 581 - 600 of 2,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2020, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
I am a tribal appellate judge for several tribes here in Michigan, and I serve on the Michigan Tribal-State-Judicial Forum. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm by Phil Dixon
“The privilege permits the United States to prevent the disclosure of information in a judicial proceeding if there is a reasonable danger that such disclosure will expose matters of state which, in the interest of national security, should not be divulged. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:50 am by Kelly Mihocik
At the time she submitted her responses to the Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees, Justice Larsen estimated that the Michigan Supreme Court had resolved by dispositive order or opinion 90 civil cases and 360 criminal cases. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:50 am by Kelly Mihocik
At the time she submitted her responses to the Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees, Justice Larsen estimated that the Michigan Supreme Court had resolved by dispositive order or opinion 90 civil cases and 360 criminal cases. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 12:07 pm by Georgialee Lang
Michigan’s District Court Judge Ken Post is at it again. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 11:28 am
Brownback, a Kansas Republican, said he wants Michigan state judge Janet Neff to testify about her role in the 2002 Massachusetts ceremony, her legal views on same-sex unions and her ability to be impartial if called upon to rule on such cases. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am by Eric P. Robinson
Judicial Conference approved digital audio recordings as a method of taking the official record of court proceedings in September 1999. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am by Eric P. Robinson
Judicial Conference approved digital audio recordings as a method of taking the official record of court proceedings in September 1999. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am by Eric P. Robinson
Judicial Conference approved digital audio recordings as a method of taking the official record of court proceedings in September 1999. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:45 am by Jason Mazzone
(Scalia made no mention of the checking function of state judicial elections.) [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
However, recently justices (e.g., Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Alito) have suggested that the Court lacks that discretion when States invoking the Court's original jurisdiction have no other judicial forum available to adjudicate their claims. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
Just as New York confusingly refers to its supreme court as the Court of Appeals, while using the term “supreme court” for its trial courts, it also denies its high court judges the title used in most other states. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm by Bob Bauer, Jack Goldsmith
First, the governor or specified state official must answer to the state court system, where he or she would be subject to judicial remedies to enforce state law. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fortunately, the Chief Justice is well known for guiding the Court in a manner that respects the function of an Article III court, evidenced by the decision in the Michigan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:24 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Here in Michigan, the Department of Corrections is among the largest bureaucracies in the state government. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:00 am by Dan Gauss
In the midst of last week’s judicial hullabaloo, the Michigan Senate revived an omnibus anti-abortion bill that could effectively eliminate safe abortion services throughout the state. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 10:20 am by Amy Howe
In a last-ditch effort to forestall the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, Texas sought on Tuesday to file a lawsuit directly in the Supreme Court, attempting to delay the Electoral College vote and prevent four states – Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – from casting their Electoral College votes for President-elect Joe Biden, who won the popular vote in each state. [read post]
Since 1887, federal law has contained what the Supreme Court has described as a “safe harbor” provision, which provides that the results of any state legal procedure for resolving disputes over the allocation of electors—judicial or otherwise—established in state law prior to Election Day shall be “conclusive” in determining how electors are to be allocated from that state. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm by Amy Howe
Supreme Court served on state supreme courts before being nominated to the court. [read post]