Search for: "State v Blake" Results 581 - 600 of 994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:00 am by James Bickford
On Friday, the President signed a law to replace the statute struck down by the Court as overbroad in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:07 am by John Jascob
The petition also includes a full-throated attack against District Court Judge Blake for his handling of the matter. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:23 am
Maybe in some world where everyone agreed about what the post-Booker structure of sentencing would be, but not here.In United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Beermann, Boston University School of Law In the wake of Lucia v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906) (corporation gets Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures but not protected by Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination); Blake v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann Judd… [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:34 am by John Day
Blake, 29 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. 2000) and Carroll v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm by Aaron Moss
The fact that Jeff Sedlik and Kat Von D are both claiming victory post-Warhol speaks to the still-confused state of the law. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:29 am by Russ Bensing
  Martin’s argument is that under Blakely v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Cunningham (2007), which struck down part of the state’s sentencing scheme, was dictated by the Court’s ruling in Blakely v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The Divisional Court considered the construction of each policy wording and the FCA, the Appellant Insurers and the Hiscox Interveners appeal on a number of points On Monday 16 November, the Supreme Court will also hear the appeal of Robinson (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]