Search for: "State v Justice"
Results 581 - 600
of 65,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Jones Reenactment will be of Clay v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm
A unanimous Supreme Court ruling in Timbs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
See Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:18 pm
On June 13, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
United States, the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 577–79 (2003), and United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 7:09 am
”) State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:11 pm
The following is a guest post by Connecticut Senior Assistant State's Attorney Harry Weller, commenting on Justice Breyer's dissenting opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:05 am
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]
1 May 2009, 2:38 am
Apostolides v Orams and Another Court of Justice of the European Communities “The fact that a judgment given in a member state of the European Community concerned land in a part of that state over which the state did not exercise effective control did not mean that the judgment was not subject to recognition and enforcement in [...] [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:48 am
In an opinion delivered by Justice Thomas, the Court held unanimously that there is no statutory “right to competence” in federal habeas proceedings; nor does a state prisoner have a right to suspension of federal habeas proceedings if he is judged mentally incompetent. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:48 am
In an opinion delivered by Justice Thomas, the Court held unanimously that there is no statutory “right to competence” in federal habeas proceedings; nor does a state prisoner have a right to suspension of federal habeas proceedings if he is judged mentally incompetent. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:51 am
The 8-1 decision in Cameron v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:55 am
Last week, as we reported here, it was Bush v. [read post]
Justices reverse Wisconsin court ruling that increased majority-Black districts in state legislature
23 Mar 2022, 6:34 pm
The ruling in Grothman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices turn to constitutional limits on appointment of administrative law judges
16 Apr 2018, 7:02 am
The justices face a lot of high-stakes cases the last week of the term – with Abbott v. [read post]
