Search for: "State v. All Out Bonding" Results 581 - 600 of 1,910
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am by John Buhl
Davis (2008), upholding Kentucky’s tax credit for investing in Kentucky bonds but not other statesbonds. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
The family-owned business at the center of Vaccari v Vaccari, 2018 NY Slip Op 30546(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 28, 2018], decided last month by veteran Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten, is a classic example of fraying family bonds in the successive ownership generations caused by divergent career interests and sibling sense of injustice over disparate treatment by their parents. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:29 am by Andrew Hamm
There’s very little in all the Brandeis scholarship out there about his inner life. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:50 am by Guest Bloggers
High Deference for State and Local Tax Actions The Davis Court upheld provisions of Kentucky’s tax code which excluded from the state income tax base income from bonds issued by the state and its localities but which did not exclude income from bonds issued by other states and their localities. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Maybe the SEC’s slow but serious enforcement approach will culminate in a crackdown that knocks out the excesses. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Thus far, the only claim to reach the courts was brought by David Zindel, son of the Pulitzer prize winner Paul Zindel.Zindel v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:10 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
Nature of PPP agreements There are two schools of thought on the nature of PPP agreements, administrative v. civil agreements. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
Grubb Steel Erection Co. v. 515 Granby, LLC case (full text of opinion in .pdf here), Suburban Grading and Utilities found this out in spades, much to their chagrin. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of United States v. [read post]