Search for: "State v. Amaral"
Results 581 - 600
of 642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
For the very sensible reasons explained by the Supreme Court of the United States in Powell v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm
[The plaintiffs in Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
My friend and case-book co-editor Akhil Reed Amar believes that it is “nonsensical” to argue that there was the slightest merit to the Southern argument for secession as presented in 1860-61. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:21 am
It’s hard to get into a lot of detail in a simple blog post but to understand the significance potentially of this rule and the elimination of it, recall the 2017 Connecticut Supreme Court case of Amaral Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am
This issue that has been debated by copyright experts over the years because, it is argued, the destruction of an artwork may or may not have a negative impact on the reputation of the artist – the test established by Article 6bis of the Berne Convention, and mirrored in most copyright laws in the world, for claiming a violation of the artist’s right of integrity (in the context of Amar Nath Sehgal v Union of India, I commented: “destruction of a work can… [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
Ohio when they decide Herring v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:14 am
Some Federalist Society members believe Kelo v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
Amar Nath Sehgal v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Wade); (5) Fix the archaic Electoral College rules by having all states adopt the National Popular Vote (NPV) provisions that have now been approved by nine states; and adopt federal laws regarding election rules that states must follow in all federal election—and if states play games with these rul [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
State of Bihar v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
originalists, or originalists who became touchstones for conservatives), we begin to see the development of the originalist v. originalist dynamic for the first time in post-war constitutional discourse, a sure sign of intellectual influence realized (see, e.g., today, liberal originalists like Akhil Amar and Jack Balkin). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
Amar (C.D. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
The unprecedented leak of a draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
And that assumption is necessary to defend INS v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
Before last week, I know of no legal authority in the United States who claimed to hold this position. [read post]
