Search for: "State v. Atkins" Results 581 - 600 of 646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Arizona, 15-8366, another state capital case. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
Texas mandate that courts deem the standard of “significantly subaverage intellectual functioning” for determining intellectual disability in Atkins v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Our next case is a sequel: Moore v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s view of what Atkins v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
”[2]For Marxist-Leninist and many post-colonial states, it is described as “Building a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind and Global Human Rights Governance. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Heller and [New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.] [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
Without representation from an attorney, Granier filed his own petition for review from the state prison in Angola, Louisiana, arguing, in Granier v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Humphreys J stated that there had been “no debate around the issue of the public interest, relevant to the anonymity of suspects, nor any consideration of the need for a fair balance of rights. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
United States The trial to determine the damages owed to writer, E Jean Carroll by Donald Trump is set to begin on Tuesday 16 January 2024 in New York. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This recommendation is not legally binding on Member States. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that the execution of those with mental retardation is unconstitutional; more on Atkins v. [read post]