Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 581 - 600
of 701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm
Austria: The ECtHR’s silent expansion of the associational dimension of the freedom to manifest religion. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm
AND MARPER v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
While Article 8 may include a positive obligation on a member state to adopt measures to secure respect for private life between individuals, the state has a wide margin of appreciation as to what is required particularly where there is a balance between competing interests or Convention rights (see, for example, Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 at [75], [77]; and see [81]) As a result, Article 8’s influence had led to the development in domestic law of a… [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:07 pm
X v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am
On those aspects which reach the Court, there will be uniformity in the Member States. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Exchange Comm. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Kohler, Special Rules for State-owned Companies in European Civil Procedure? [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:31 am
In Zhang v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm
š v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:43 pm
It is still open to the government to impose limits on what kind of prisoners can and cannot vote, but in light of the recent case of Frodl v Austria, the categories of prisoners whose vote can legitimately be taken away may be fairly limited. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:12 pm
277/10, Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria), in which the legal issues were a good deal more complex than "who gets what? [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
Importantly, today’s ruling does not impact NanoString’s legal ability to market or sell CosMx SMI products for protein detection in the European Union, nor does it impact the lawful selling of any NanoString CosMx SMI products in the United States, the United Kingdom or the rest of the world outside of the EU member states participating in the UPC system. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:36 am
Most recently, in Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:52 am
The same European patent was also in force in Denmark, Ireland, Greece, Luxembourg, Austria, Portugal, Finland, Sweden, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am
“Austria demands clarification,” said Interior Minister Johanna Mikl-Leitner. [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:30 am
May 25-26, 2023, Vienna, Austria. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am
The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
