Search for: "State v. Bridges" Results 581 - 600 of 2,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2019, 6:16 am by Sam Jungyun Choi
  The ICO’s investigation was triggered by the recent UK High Court decision in R (Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales (see our previous blog post here), where the court held that the use of facial recognition technology by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was lawful. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:59 am by Florence Campbell Jones
SWITZERLAND Reuters reported that Switzerland’s economic growth decelerated in the second quarter of 2019 to 0.3 per cent from a downwardly revised 0.4  per  cent in the previous period. [read post]
  However, the union claimed that decades of NLRB case law was unconstitutional and that its activity was protected as free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution pursuant to Reed v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Louisiana, in which the justices considered whether the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a unanimous jury applies to the states, and Rotkiske v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
None covered Stromberg, the first case in which a state law was found to violate the Freedom of Speech. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am by Jim Baker
 It is time for the United States to stop debating whether to address it, and start talking about how to address it. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful –  Suneet Sharma. [read post]