Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 581 - 600
of 15,314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
B. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:35 am
Section 332(c)(7)(B)(ii) explicitly supplants state authority by requiring zoning authorities to render a decision “within a reasonable period of time,” and the meaning of that phrase is indisputably a question of federal law. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
” The Bankruptcy Court disagreed, stating that it had the power to enter judgment on the counterclaim under § 157(b)(1). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 7:32 am
” The court also says Section 230(c)(2)(B) protects YouTube’s Restricted Mode, citing Prager for the proposition that YouTube’s Restricted Mode is exactly the kind of self-regulation Congress sought to protect. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
C. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Chamberlain v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:53 am
Granting certiorari to review the Fourth Circuit and Ninth Circuit decisions affirming injunctions against Sections 2(c), 6(a), and 6(b) of President Trump’s second “travel ban,”the U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:14 am
Nothing in the text of Rule 55(c) or Rule 60(b) suggests that a registering court lacks the power to vacate the judgment of a different rendering court. . . .We decline to establish a categorical rule stating that registering courts lack the power to use Rule 60(b)(6) to vacate the judgments of rendering courts, but we emphasize that registering courts should exercise this power only under very limited circumstances. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
" 42 U.S.C. s 11607(b)(3). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:25 pm
Especially in New Jersey which has (as do many other States), the famous (or infamous) A-B-C test. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
§ 2105(c). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
As anticipated, the Supreme Court of the United States this morning reversed the district court's order in Dukes v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:42 am
Susan V. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm
(b) Myriad’s DNA claim falls within the law of nature exception. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 8:41 pm
Project South v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
Jan. 11, 2008), the court (Judge William B. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 4:57 pm
The Court stated that DRL 240(1-b)(c)(7) does not provide for a SUNY cap. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
C (Def. [read post]
