Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 581 - 600
of 7,460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 11:35 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:26 am
Here's the abstract:The Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Oorah, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
On August 3, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Masterson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
In Foundation for the Advancement of Catholic Schools, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
SmandychLaura Weinrib, The Taming of Free Speech: America’s Civil Liberties Compromise Anders WalkerPeter Wallenstein, Race, Sex, and the Freedom to Marry: Loving v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Shannon v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:05 am
In Hunt Valley Baptist Church, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:25 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School Professor and champion of a less copyright-restricted Internet, last month joined forces with the Electronic Frontier Foundation to file suit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against a Melbourne, Australia-based record company that accused the professor of infringing on a copyrighted song by using it in a lecture presented on YouTube.In his 11-page complaint, Lessig v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 1:32 pm
In Indiana Coalition for Public Education v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
In O’Connor v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently held in the case of State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 3:01 pm
In Truth v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Rix LJ found it significant Campbell and others v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
” In Tuesday’s United States v. [read post]
