Search for: "State v. Concepcion" Results 581 - 600 of 1,160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2012, 9:13 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
On May 1, we received the following comment in response to a post from last May entitled Will AT&T v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:11 pm by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
Largent This week a California court held that the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:28 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
Concepcion,[5]  holding that “when a state law prohibits outright the arbitration of a particular type of claim, the analysis is straightforward: The conflicting rule is displaced by the FAA. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:00 pm by Deepak Gupta
Concepcion's effects, it seems, have been felt on a daily basis since then. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:55 am by Marissa Miller
United States, in which the Court will consider whether its ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:08 pm by AALRR
Keating, the Supreme Court held the FAA applies to state courts and is intended to preempt state anti-arbitration laws to the contrary, and in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:46 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Concepcion are of limited help to defendants in state court because, while many state courts follow federal law on class certification, they are not required to do so. [read post]