Search for: "State v. Conn" Results 581 - 600 of 1,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2018, 8:50 am by Patricia Jeng
Administrator 828 A.2d 609, 613 (Conn. 2003), a case favorably cited by Dynamex, the Court concluded that it “follow[s] the Kirby [of Norwich v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:19 am
Boyd, 992 A.2d 1071, 1080-81 (Conn. 2010) (reasonable expectation of privacy in cell phone); but see United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
To be admissible, such testimony must  comply with the requirements for reliability and relevance established in State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:51 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
It is well established that "[t]he federal constitution require[s] that criminal defendants be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense....The sixth amendment... [read post]