Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 581 - 600
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 2:16 pm
The United States Supreme Court, however, disrupted that practice in some circuits in 2006. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit have again rejected the coach’s claims. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:38 pm
The closest constitutional challenge to the PTAB was probably in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Rupert A. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 12:49 pm
See Santosky v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
As the instant petition illustrates, the resultant unresolved divisions among the Courts of Appeals can have direct and severe consequences for defendants’ sentences. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 6:43 am
The Florida Court of Appeal stated that the marital home, like any other asset, is subject to equitable distribution. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 10:34 am
Parish, that I successfully argued in the Appellate Division, where the Appellate Division held that the trial court could not divert enforcement and all issues to the PC. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
SkyKick’s back with a bad faith shocker from the Court of AppealSky v SkyKick [2021] EWCA Civ 1121 (July 2021) I covered the latest (ninth) SkyKick judgement in this IPKat post back in the summer. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 6:20 am
The case is People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm
(Please note that these figures reflect only federal court securities class action lawsuit filings; the filing numbers do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings during the year.) [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
In theory, Employment Division v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:58 am
As stated by the Appellate Division, First Department in Yudell v Gilbert, borrowing from the Delaware Supreme Court’s Tooley formulation, the determination depends on “(1) who suffered the alleged harm (the corporation or the stockholders); and (2) who would receive the benefit of any recovery or other remedy (the corporation or the stockholders individually). [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
California v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm
In the Lokhova v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
I would like to thank the authors for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 7:28 am
This is a quick follow-up to Monday's post on InterDigital v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 1:48 am
In the UK, the High Court found Bayer's formulation patent for an approved salt form of sorafenib obvious-to-try in view of the preliminary phase I clinical trial results for the drug (IPKat). [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 3:09 pm
Certain states on the East Coast like Virginia, South Carolina have a one-year waiting period. [read post]