Search for: "State v. Crown"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Balanced against and ultimately constraining common law (popular custom as a source of law) was both the administrative apparatus of the state (the Crown) and the legislative apparatus of the government (Parliament). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
As the SCC stated in Ontario v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
More recently though, the Court stated in 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 7:19 am
This section identifies seven issues: knowledge transfer strategies, IP abuse and misuse, fair use/flexible fair dealing, anti-circumvention legislation exceptions, artificial intelligence, crown copyright, and copyright term. i. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:43 am
R (Imran Bashir) v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – Read Judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:20 am
Read-the-whole-case rating: 3.R. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:19 am
To which extent may state authorities (in this case, the State of North Carolina) act as copyright pirates? [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:00 am
For example, in R v C.W. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
In this text, Nichols describes the evolution of the concept of this relationship from that of (purportedly) equal nations dealing with mutual independence and respect to the open, unilateral assertion of Crown sovereignty that was intended “from the outset” (R v Sparrow, [1990] 1 SCR 1075 at para 49). [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
In the case of the Hatice Cengiz v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:31 am
And in Bentley Estate v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:22 am
Madison to Batson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 1:15 pm
The Supreme Court reiterated that link in a 1965 opinion stating that the history of the Fourth Amendment is “largely a history of conflict between the Crown and the press. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:22 am
Madison to Batson v. [read post]
