Search for: "State v. Dodd"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 10:56 am
These bylaw provisions gained notoriety in the recent case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm
Liu v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:59 am
Dodd-Frank Act did not apply. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Louis School of LawLynda Dodd, City College of New York, Colin Powell School for Civic and Global LeadershipMary Ziegler, Florida State University College of LawCo-Moderator: Tracy A. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
This case examines the territorial reach of that statute.The case is Meng-Lin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am
Supreme Court held in Fifth Third Bank v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
This month the Washington State Court of Appeals, Division III issued a ruling in Becker v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
See Gupta v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
This action is called a Dodd removal, in tribute to the State Senator who penned the authorizing legislation. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:51 am
What is not obvious to all is whether the United States Supreme Court will agree that anyone can be forced to abide by such restrictions consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 1:08 pm
In a one-two punch illustrating the continuing vigor of the presumption against extraterritoriality, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, on consecutive days last week, issued important decisions applying Morrison v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 3:22 am
The Second Circuit’s decision clearly will have an impact on prospective whistleblowers outside the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am
Of course, courts should resist the “temptation to overlook or ignore fixed legal principles when they are opposed to persuasive equities” because, as the ancient legal proverb teaches, “hard cases make bad law” (Dodd v Anderson, 197 NY 466, 469 [1910]). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:57 pm
Supreme Court in the 2010 case of Morrison v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:28 am
The outcome of this case may give the SEC some hope that the Court will reverse the three-judge panel’s holding that the Dodd-Frank Act conflict minerals disclosure rules violate the First Amendment in National Association of Manufacturers, et al., v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am
In Perez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:26 am
It is uncertain whether any of the state AG lawsuits will rely upon Section 1042 of Dodd-Frank, which, as we have previously reported, allows a state AG to bring a civil action for violation of the Dodd-Frank prohibition of unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices (UDAAP). [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm
111-203, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), is authority to issue regulations and take enforcement actions under the two major federal statutes that specify conditions under which customer financial information may be shared by financial institutions: Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA, P.L. 106-102) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). [read post]
