Search for: "State v. FIELDS" Results 581 - 600 of 12,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 6:50 am by gstasiewicz
Judicial Watch, the government watchdog group, announced today that its client, the Arizona State Legislature, has been granted permission to intervene as a defendant in the Obama Justice Department lawsuit (USA v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
For various reasons, the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision on Tuesday in Haywood v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
In Waya the Supreme Court introduced the concept of proportionality to the calculation of confiscation orders and in R v Ahmed, R v Fields the Court introduced an extra-statutory rule which prevents multiple co-defendants from each being required to pay an amount equal to a jointly obtained benefit. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 11:09 am by and
Redfin and Galen had entered into a “Field Agent Independent Contractor Agreement,” which expressly stated that Galen would perform his services for Redfin as an independent contractor. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 12:36 pm
  The issue is whether the job requires a college degree in a particulars skill that is directly related to the job.The case is Solis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
See N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-3a(1) ("state of the art" a complete defense).Drugs have always been treated more carefully by the law than things that go clank, and courts have been very leery of tinkering with the state-of-the-art defense in a field so dependent upon advances in scientific knowledge as prescription drugs. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 10:21 pm by Mark Summerfield
A new research dataset released by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reveals that since the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its 2010 ruling in Bilski v Kappos, the rate at which US patent applications are rejected on subject-matter grounds (as compared with other grounds of rejection) has increased from 8% to 13%. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 3:11 pm
Jakes premised the majority of his submission on the Diamond v Diehr decision. [read post]