Search for: "State v. Hobbs" Results 581 - 600 of 757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
Taney didn't do it, but, if one can accept Story's similarly-motivated opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at the Washington Examiner, Jay Hobbs weighs in on National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague; (2) whether Hobbs Act robbery is a “crime of violence” as defined by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Baylor, No. 07-3002 Defendant's convictions for interfering with commerce by robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, and using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the requirement of a de minimis effect on interstate commerce under the Hobbs Act is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in US v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm by Lawrence Solum
Notice Kant's use of the phrase is, in a sense, diametrically opposed to Hobbes's. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
I recall being enraptured by Griswold v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Its deterrent effect is the same as if the State were to fine them for this speech. . . . [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
Grassi, 783 F.2d 1572 (11th Cir. 1986) that a component of extortion for the purposes of the Hobbs Act is the victim’s fearful state of mind, and that “fear” is “‘a state of anxious concern, alarm or apprehension of harm and it includes fear of economic loss as well as fear of physical violence. [read post]