Search for: "State v. House" Results 581 - 600 of 28,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am by ISAAC RICHARDSON
Foskett J was clearly sympathetic to the suggestion of the Secretary of State that the UK would be in compliance with the Convention if they continued to house the families in the SBAs, but transferred the responsibility for securing their other rights to another signatory state. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 5:42 am by Kate Fort
Tom Murphy, in-house at GRIC, is doing the oral argument for the tribe here. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:30 pm
Category: Infringement      By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor  TitleSpecialty House of Creation, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 11:07 pm
Washington D.C. is "the window through which the world looks into our house," wrote the Justice Department in the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Brown v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (D. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 8:50 am by Jake McGowan
Bouncing Angels, Inc., a district court in Minnesota found personal jurisdiction over a defendant company that sold a single (allegedly infringing) inflatable carousel bounce house within the state. [read post]
The bill’s co-sponsors wrote a memo detailing the importance of the legislation, saying: In the landmark 2020 decision Bostock v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:16 am
The United States House of Representatives determined that the proceeds should be divided equally among the wife and the four sons. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 8:44 am by Ezra Rosser
Mayer, which held that private acts of race discrimination in housing were prohibited by the Civil Rights Act; and United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 9:22 pm by Norm Pattis
He and a co-defendant did kidnap, rape and murder a mother and two daughters after beating the man of the house and leaving him for dead. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
”In response, the Smiths filed claims against the landlord in the United States District Court of Colorado alleging wrongful discrimination predicated upon sexual identity, familial status, and sexual orientation.After a motion for summary judgment, the court found the owner liable for discrimination in violation of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and the Federal Fair Housing Act (FHA). [read post]