Search for: "State v. Jonathan Thomas"
Results 581 - 600
of 666
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 12:03 pm
Below, Jonathan Eisenman of Akin Gump recaps last week’s opinion in 08-1200, Jerman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am
The Keller Family Christine Keller drove to Madisonville Tuesday with her four sons Joshua (16), Joel (15), Jeremy (celebrating his 10th anniversary on 3 May) and Jonathan (6) from another state. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:38 am
Jonathan P. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:15 pm
On these issues, my view is very different from that of most right of center legal scholars, including co-blogger Jonathan Adler, who was very critical of the Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm
[The plaintiffs in Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Shoemaker, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Sanctuary Law and a Strong Anglo-Saxon State? [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
Thomas, while the case page for Renico v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
After Justice Thomas announced his opinion in United Student Aid Funds yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in New Process Steel v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
International LawK5256 .M36 2010The United States, international law, and the struggle against terrorism / Thomas Michael McDonnell.McDonnell, Thomas Michael.London ; New York : Routledge, 2010. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm
Thomas, Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am
Reporting and commentary on the import of last month’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v) It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:53 am
During his speech, Thomas “vigorously defended” the Court’s Citizens United ruling and said that he does not attend the State of the Union address “because the gatherings ha[ve] turned so partisan. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am
ABC News quotes University of Texas law professor Lucas Powe, who speculates that the Justices will likely opt not to attend the State of the Union address next year, while Robert Barnes, writing for the Washington Post, points out that each Justice chooses whether to attend the State of the Union address each year (this year, Justices Stevens, Scalia, and Thomas all skipped the speech). [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:32 am
A Newsweek opinion article by Jonathan Alter accuses the conservative Justices of hypocrisy: in his view, they departed from their usual position of judicial restraint with regard to the states when they struck down corporate campaign spending laws in twenty-two states. [read post]
