Search for: "State v. Kelly" Results 581 - 600 of 2,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In 2017 the member received a response to the member's inquiry concerning his pension benefit stating the "there is nothing further than can be done. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Last month, the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit held a reenactment of the argument in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court of Appeals had affirmed the denial of those benefits by Respondents in connection with the evidence submitted on her first two applications, Matter of Salerno v Kelly, 139 AD3d 516.In support of her third attempt, Plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a retired colleague, stating that at the time of the terrorist attack, he was stationed with Plaintiff at the offices of the Internal Affairs Bureau. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:09 am
[Thanks to Kelly V for her clear and concise explanation]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:46 pm
Kelly(SCOTUSwiki description here), which is an important concerning standards of review under AEDPA. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:08 am
Laurie K Miller with the Charleston, West Virginia firm of Jackson Kelly PLLC    Teresa M. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:08 am
Laurie K Miller with the Charleston, West Virginia firm of Jackson Kelly PLLC    Teresa M. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
Neugebauer stated that the superiority of this type of proximity analysis was well-established. [read post]
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Tuesday ruled that plaintiffs in The Arc of Iowa v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
Attorneys for Michael Dean Overstreet had argued that his severe mental illness at the time he was convicted of killing Kelly Eckart would make his execution cruel and unusual punishment under the state constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive” (Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]; see Cordell Marble Falls, LLC v Kelly, 191 AD3d at 762). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:07 pm by Julie Lam
  Justice Marilyn Kelly would grant reconsideration. [read post]