Search for: "State v. Liptak"
Results 581 - 600
of 991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
Bethune-Hill, an appeal by Republican legislators of a lower-court ruling that requires 11 state legislative districts to be redrawn to correct racial gerrymandering, and Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Yesterday, in Trump v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
The other appeal, Holder v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am
NFIB urges the justices to review Berninger v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the challenged law “requires providers of the procedure to have contracts with doctors who have admitting privileges at a hospital in the state. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 3:06 pm
The petition in Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
Last year, in Riegel v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
Bennett, consolidated with McComish v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am
And in Luna Torres v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
United States, Town of Chester v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:54 am
Brathwaite in 1977.Adam Liptak talks about this in his New York Times Sidebar column (yes, Liptak's still around). [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
Yesterday the court heard argument in Husted v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:20 am
” Six days after Friday’s announcement that the Court will review a challenge to a Texas law imposing additional regulations on abortion clinics in that state, coverage of and commentary on Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
As Adam Liptak reports in the New York Times, October term 2016 produced an unusual degree of unanimity. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
United States and Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Charles Sauer looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
First up is Thacker v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
