Search for: "State v. Lucas" Results 581 - 600 of 695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:37 am by Jeff Gamso
Not the actual jury in this caseThe scene: The Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, Toledo, OhioThe event: A felony jury trial.The case: State of Ohio v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Urge them to become a member immediately to defend you against the state's unscientific breath test machine. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am by Frank Cranmer
The debate had an international rather than a domestic focus and was replied to by the Minister of State at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Anne-Marie Trevelyan. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:55 pm by Matt DeVries
This was the question that the Indiana Supreme Court addressed in its opinion issued on March 22, 2012, in the case of Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:21 pm by Guest Blogger
Constitution when governmental regulation leads to a total loss of economic value – under Lucas v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Quite to the contrary, the Court held in Lucas…that the trial court must balance the state’s interest against the defendant’s interest on a case-by-case basis, and neither interest is superior per se. [read post]