Search for: "State v. Makee R." Results 581 - 600 of 34,772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2017, 4:42 pm by David Lat
Paul, Weiss partner Roberta Kaplan reflects on the history-making case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
 In other words, whilst the question of validity of an EU law is not a matter for a national court to decide the application itself can be rejected if the national court considers that there are no grounds for saying that an EU law is invalid.While it is open to a court to refer questions on the validity of EU law when considering the kind of legal conclusion the national court is entitled to reach (see R (Telephonica 02 Europe PLC) v Secretary of State for… [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 2:51 am by Eleanor Mitchell
R ((DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 October 2019 and 8 October 2019 . [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am by Rosalind English
R(on the application of S and KF) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 1810 (Admin)- read judgment This case about prisoner’s pay provides an interesting up to date analysis of the role of the doctrine of “margin of appreciation” and its applicability in domestic courts. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:52 am
Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case filed by the state of Georgia against Public.Resource.org (the nonprofit organization founded by Carl Malamud dedicated to "Making Government Information More Accessible"). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:53 am by Jarod Bona
The US Supreme Court issued its eagerly awaited decision today in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Rosalind English
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]