Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 581 - 600 of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2019, 9:10 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
However, as we have previously reported, recent Australian cases (such as Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92 (Lodestar)) demonstrated that licensing arrangements may expose trade mark owners to the risk of trade mark removal. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:10 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
However, as we have previously reported, recent Australian cases (such as Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92 (Lodestar)) demonstrated that licensing arrangements may expose trade mark owners to the risk of trade mark removal. [read post]
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
Further, the appeals court said that the district court properly treated the likelihood of confusion question as a matter of law, despite some earlier circuit rulings to the contrary (RiseandShine Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:27 am
Agler states that he spoke to Westheimer personnel twice at this show, notifying them that Westheimer's products were infringing the Stratotone mark. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:47 am by Becky
The BoA noted that the Opposition Division did not state this to be the case here, nor had Pinball filed any arguments in this respect. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:47 am by Marc DeGirolami
Mark Movsesian and I have this Legal Spirits podcast discussing Carson v. [read post]
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]