Search for: "State v. Money"
Results 581 - 600
of 20,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Montana [official website] on Friday ruled [decision, PDF] that its state's November ballots may include Initiative 166 [text, PDF], a nonbinding policy statement that would direct the state's congress to support an amendment to the US Constitution [text] asserting that corporations are not people and money does not qualify as speech. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:22 am
Adam Schaeffer of the Cato Institute writes in All of Your Money Belongs to the State that the 9th circuit thinks just that: Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in an appeal of a 9th Circuit decision, Winn v Garriott, a challenge to one of Arizona’s education tax credit programs. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:11 am
Texas [Cornell LII Backgrounder] that states do not consent to waive their sovereign immunity to private suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) [42 USC § 2000cc, text]. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:22 am
Back in 2005, the Indiana Court of Appeals decided Dommer v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:05 am
Much of that money then goes to fund extensive lobbying. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:35 am
Defendants are four Chinese nationals who embezzle a huge -- and I mean, huge -- amount of money from the Bank of China. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am
Brown v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:22 am
You can read the Supreme Court decision at Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:47 am
In Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:50 pm
In State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm
Baltimore, and Dred Scott v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:37 am
This concentration of wealth and financial expertise has enticed many out-of-state investors to place their money in securities with New York-based financial institutions in the prospect of riches; however, coupled with the influx of these out-of-state investments is the potential for legal action by each dissatisfied or defrauded investor. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:19 pm
Which reverses the trial court and threatens to take away a large amount of money from state court judges not only in Los Angeles, but across the state as well. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:10 am
The style of the case is, Mark Rotella and Mark Rotella Custom Homes, Inc. d/b/a Benchmark Custom Homes v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 pm
That’s the question the Illinois Supreme Court debated late in its September term, hearing oral argument in State of Illinois v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm
By Eric Goldman United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:48 am
North Carolina is not a title-controls state. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The Secretary of State was therefore right to conclude that Ms Wang did not have the money “under [her] control” for the purposes of the Immigration Rules. [read post]
