Search for: "State v. Morales"
Results 581 - 600
of 6,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2024, 7:24 pm
In Satz v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:48 am
This latest decision, February 14, affirms the ruling by the district court that the public morality concerns of the Alabama legislature remain a sufficient rational justification to sustain the law, even after Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:26 pm
Iran v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court stated in Seminole Nation v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:18 pm
The findings of the trial court are supported by the record (People v Morales 42 NY2d 129, 138 [1977]). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:01 pm
In Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day, RPost Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Removal of an officer of a political subdivision of the State for misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in officeMatter of Hedman v Town Bd. of Town of Howard, 2008 NY Slip Op 09229, decided on November 21, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth Department Gerald S. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:14 am
Due to these concerns including the ones raised by the media (see here, here and here), INEC issued a press release which was also reported here and here, stating its own position on the judgment. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:07 am
Copyright Office Seeks Public Comments on Moral RightsThe United States Copyright Office announced it is undertaking “a public study to assess the current state of U.S. law recognizing and protecting moral rights for authors, specifically the rights of attribution and integrity. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:08 am
.➤➤ Among the volunteer writers, Salman Rushdie has chosen United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 7:51 am
In State of Hawaii v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court Decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:43 am
Here is yet another example – the precision of drones is another – where technological developments that in once sense enhance the United States’ military authority also end up constraining it because once there is capacity to be precise in targeting, the moral or political (and, soon, legal) duty to do so soon follows, regardless of what the law previously required. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” As Chief Justice Marshall put it (quoting Justice Ginsburg in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am
” – Professor Daniel Tanovich @dtanovich In R v S. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court today heard arguments in the cases of Jackson v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 10:39 am
Gill et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:12 pm
Hill (1987) ("the First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge directed at police officers"); United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
In the 1832 case Worchester v. [read post]
