Search for: "State v. Peace" Results 581 - 600 of 4,271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 3:47 pm
  That vessel permits a broad scope of discretionary decisions whether or not in conformity to expectations that is protected by international law, or, more specifically, by the structural nature of the state system with its ideology that states can do no wrong unless they are (eventually--and rarely) brought to account by other states. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 9:02 am by Eleonora Rosati
This is what the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had been asked to consider in Safarov v Azerbaijan (Application no. 885/12). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
ColbDuring the Mississippi abortion case argued earlier this term, the attorney defending the prohibition invoked the case of Washington v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
It claims to process over 250 million devices per month within the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Discipline, persistence, and stamina are attributes of most successful law students and lawyers, and the sooner one makes peace with that reality, the better. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:16 am by Ezequiel Heffes
In any given society, including ones with internal stability and relative peace, respect for the law can be linked to a number of factors. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 10:58 am by Jordan Schneider
v=qV6Wc_f1Cgo&t=195s I HAVE CHINATALK NEWSLETTER WHICH YOU SHOULD ALL SIGN UP TO READ! [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 10:58 am by Jordan Schneider
v=qV6Wc_f1Cgo&t=195s I HAVE CHINATALK NEWSLETTER WHICH YOU SHOULD ALL SIGN UP TO READ! [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 10:44 am by JURIST Staff
In 1993, in the case of Amaratunge v Sirimal, Justice Mark Fernando of Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court made a remark that remains relevant. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Ben Saul
This was novel at the time, since the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has long maintained, since Nicaragua v U.S. (1986), that self-defense is only available if a non-state armed group is “sent” by a government, not where a group independently attacks. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Genevieve Nadeau
The Supreme Court has never adopted the theory (indeed, it has previously rejected it), but recently agreed to hear Moore v. [read post]