Search for: "State v. Personnel Housing"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
With the change in Court personnel since NFIB v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
From Saline Parents v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
A old-ish Lawfare post related to this personnel decision that’s received a lot of hits this week: Mr. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Office of Personnel Management The Bulk Data for Me but Not for Thee Award: Los Angeles Police Department I Wanted to Clarify That My A** is Covered Award: White House The Transparently Proud of Destroying Public Records Awards: Michael Gableman The Ancient Art of Dodging Accountability Award: Cyber Ninjas The Transparency Tax Award: Mendocino County The Burn After Reading Award: Immigration and Customs Enforcement The MisFIRE in All Directions Award: Irvington Township (I'm… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
The California state court found that `[t]he records include confidential personnel records ordinarily protected against disclosure by the employee's right to privacy . . . [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
In writing my testimony for today’s House Judiciary Committee hearing on drones and targeted killing of U.S. citizens overseas, I found myself writing a more complete explication of the essential legal rationale underlying the administration’s position on the subject than I have, to date, set down in one place. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:30 am
In the June 8, 2015 ruling in Hill v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
Simons Waterfront LLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 1:54 pm
Wehrenberg v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:06 pm
Nearly 50 years ago, Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 10:18 am
See State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Note, moreover, that language deficiencies tend to affect some receiving states much more than others. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm
However, if the State were to adopt Model Rule 8.4(g), its provisions raise serious concerns about the constitutionality of the restrictions it would place on members of the State Bar and the resulting harm to the clients they represent. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:51 am
v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
As the Transition Team website notes: The Agency Review Teams for the Obama-Biden Transition will complete a thorough review of key departments, agencies and commissions of the United States government, as well as the White House, to provide the President-elect, Vice President-elect, and key advisors with information needed to make strategic policy, budgetary, and personnel decisions prior to the inauguration. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:07 pm
From two Nov. 30 opinions in Wilkerson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The Feres doctrine, stemming from the 1950 Feres v. [read post]
