Search for: "State v. Plan" Results 581 - 600 of 29,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am by vforberger
Dep’t of Labor had explicitly directed states to NOT charge administrative concealment penalties for PUA benefits and BEFORE the U.S. [read post]
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard):  On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Wade stunted the development of other strains of constitutional argument for reproductive freedom and autonomy while Roe and later Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Temporary Allowance of Claims for Voting on a Plan See this practice note for the requirements for temporarily allowing claims for purposes of voting on a Chapter 11 plan. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC summarily states that a “hypothetical monopolist of accessible luxury handbags likely would undertake a SSNIPT on consumers” and could do so profitably. [read post]