Search for: "State v. Revels"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
This argument formed the basis of the dissent to one of the key cases the FBI relies upon, United States v New York Telephone Co., 434 US159 (1977). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
” The Times report is chocked full of revelations about the evolving nature of U.S. cyberwar doctrine and capabilities. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:44 am
If only they had tackled, instead of weaved at the State Championship. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:47 am
Secondly, the Court stated [66] that while the prosecution and defence arguments may be of assistance to the judge, there are interests – presumably the interest in open justice – that they cannot always adequately represent: ‘… there are some cases, of which the present… may be an example, where the judge would be greatly assisted by an independent lawyer assigned to provide assistance in the same way as in the present case both the [trial] judge and this… [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 9:00 pm
I disagreed with his dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:25 pm
Heller in which he wrote the majority opinion and Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:54 am
In Barrett v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:38 am
I have no idea whether Lindy would be a good or bad state representative, or whether I would agree with his positions on various policy issues. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Most recently, the Ontario government launched a public inquiry following the revelation that pathologist Dr. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:54 am
. *** China Again Rejects PH v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:54 am
Responding to the grisly revelations arising from the trial of Dr. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
Other states may choose to take a different approach. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:38 pm
The Massachusetts high court held today, in Magazu v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 11:34 am
In Turner Construction v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Five years after we filed Jewel, and responding to further revelations in 2013 by whistleblower Edward Snowden, we filed First Unitarian Church v NSA on behalf of nearly two dozen organizations from across the political spectrum. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Back in 2004, Californian state senator Kevin Murray wrote this in a report in US recording industry practices:“Much like the public generally dislikes politicians, but love their individual representatives, Artists have respect for their record company handlers, but distrust the companies themselves and the system they operate under. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm
” This revelation comes as President Obama and other Pentagon officials look into the allegations of the doctored intelligence reports. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:32 am
This is the executive summary of the decision (Bemejo v. [read post]
