Search for: "State v. Sellers" Results 581 - 600 of 3,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 5:55 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  With the Goldman hearings a few weeks ago discussing practices in CDOs such as barbelling and the use of stated income loans, the idea that buyers would protect themselves (that they could uncover these practices) was becoming increasingly untenable. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:16 pm by Daniel K. McClendon
  Second, the Senators argued that the overturn of Quill would not mean the Court could not protect interstate sellers though other doctrines, such as the balancing test in Pike v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:49 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
Real estate agents who commit fraud can cause buyers and sellers serious harm. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:22 pm by Submitted Post
States of the United States do not have customs regulations and most states do not have to deal with international security issues in the course of interstate commerce. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited has now been posted on the Curia website. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am by Tatiana Sinodinou
Apart from the problems of identification of the distant on line seller which is based in another Member state, courts will have to accommodate the question of the proper enforcement of the payment by an entity which is based in another Member state. [read post]