Search for: "State v. Shelters"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Eugene Volokh] California Court Upholds First Amendment Right Not to Bake Cake for Same-Sex Wedding
6 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
& Hous. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 8:51 am
(See, e.g., Kaiser Aetna v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 7:51 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in MGM v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:47 am
From yesterday's Seventh Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:21 am
(the U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
In my previous post, I explored the extent to which the Munaf v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 6:50 am
In Texas v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
By Marty Lederman and David LubanThis coming Friday, the Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to consider, at conference, the government’s nominal “petition for certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
This broad protection of confidentiality is common to all states. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:43 pm
For an early articulation that seems to echo this view, see the summary of the trial judge's instructions in State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
McRae and Webster v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:45 am
Our case, Garza v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:15 am
Last month I published a post here about the Solicitor General’s nominal “Petition for Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm
First, in Gureckis, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 3298 (Admin) the Government’s policy of deporting rough sleeping EU citizens was found to be unlawful, discriminatory and in breach of EU regulations on right to reside. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court first clarified this important right in the 1963 case Gideon v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court first clarified this important right in the 1963 case Gideon v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:15 am
The statute isn’t limited “to one-to-one communications,” which might be restrictable under Rowan v. [read post]
