Search for: "State v. Short"
Results 581 - 600
of 22,688
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2017, 11:54 am
"And that's even from an author (Judge McKeown) who's probably generally somewhat sympathetic to the plaintiff's cause.In short, no, you're not going to win this lawsuit. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
It's one thing to say, as the Court mistakenly said in Alden v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 6:37 am
Jess Eisinger's fine reporting on the Sears Canada takeover by Eddie Lampert (Long Short, Wall Street Journal) illustrates a growing problem in United States takeovers as well. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
If they are (as Wilson's study on state R&D tax credits suggests) a zero-sum game in which states or cities are compelled to pay to attract "star scientists," maybe they should be prohibited under the dormant Commerce Clause, as the Sixth Circuit suggested in Cuno v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
Additional Resources: Barneck v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 8:09 pm
This methodology led Professor Natelson to conclude that 33 states have active resolutions, one short of the 34 that would trigger the calling of a convention. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am
In short, the Amber Alert was no evidence that A.B.M. was (or remains) outside of Mexico, let alone that she was (or remains) in the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
Short -- relatively, at least -- to the point, and completely coherent.And yet I think she's wrong.The question is a simple one: When you serve a corporation, when does the 30-day removal clock start ticking? [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:58 pm
We have jurisdiction to determine our own jurisdiction, Special Invs., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:40 pm
In a short decision in the Newsday circulation fraud case, United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
Sargent v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:21 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 9:21 am
Today, the Supreme Court (of the United States) will hear oral arguments in Tyler v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:52 am
Congress acts, in short, against the background of the total corpus juris of the states in much the way that a state legislature acts against the background of the common law, assumed to govern unless changed by legislation.One might think that patent law is entirely federal, but Professor Amar (who has also reviewed an earlier edition of the casebook) liked to remind us that federal law is never in a vacuum.Amar often cited a 1957 article by the late Paul Mishkin, The… [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm
The single most important battle here is about market definition, which may create a situation in which Apple would have no chance of successfully defending itself (short of a successful appeal).In the very short term, the Arizona state legislature is going to vote on an App Store bill introduced by Republican state lawmakers Dr. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
In short, the majority concluded that the Secretary of State was entitled to exercise his discretion in such a way as to respect to the different choices of the devolved legislatures. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:21 am
From Carroll v. [read post]
