Search for: "State v. Small" Results 581 - 600 of 16,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
Elenis, Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm by Joanna Powis and Jonathan Lord
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd, a gender… [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 1:13 pm by David Klein
Currently pending before the United States Supreme Court is the matter of Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 12:45 pm by Marcia Coyle
The Biden administration appealed the ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
Morgan Reed—president of the APP Association, a global trade association for small and medium-sized technology companies—presented extensively on the subject at the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) COPPA workshop (which is worth reading in full). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:37 am by Katherine Macfarlane
The chain of events leading to the reasonable accommodation denial in Oross v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am by Felix Mikolasch
Tiny or frivolous claims are still not likely, given that litigation costs in most Member States are much higher, and litigation over small amounts simply does not pay off for plaintiffs. [read post]
The court became involved following allegations of corruption in the local police force and claims that firearms were stolen from the state arsenal and used to fuel ethnic violence that overtook the small northeast Indian state in early summer. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
When it approved the CAT, the Commission stated that plan participants could “recoup their regulatory costs . . . through the collection of fees from their members, as long as such fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]