Search for: "State v. Spencer"
Results 581 - 600
of 764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2011, 12:38 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
” [via Illinois Supreme Court prepared summary] United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Martha Elizabeth, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court, January 20, 2010 Wood v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court, January 20, 2010 Wood v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
Supreme Court's Lewis v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:50 pm
In Dobbs, the Supreme Court reversed its previous 1973 Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 6:37 am
Bracewell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
Herbert Spencer was a big author for this purpose, especially in the US. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” But Rosen then adds that “Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
Case 1:15-cv-09796-JSR, Spencer Meyer v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm
Statements of President Obama made today (June 22, 2012) in celebration of the 13th anniversary of the June 22, 1999 Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
On 4 July 2018, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of BVC v EWF. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Spencer, No. 07-40593 "A decision amending a 1995 judgment sentencing defendant for carjacking, resulting in an increase to the amount of restitution owed, is affirmed where: 1) under a reasonable reading of the relevant rules and case law, the district court's amendment amounted to a clerical revision that did not substantively alter defendant's sentence; and 2) thus, the time limitation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 was inapplicable. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:51 am
Following substantial briefing and a lengthy hearing, this Court, reviewing the matter de novo, see United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:22 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:48 am
A few weeks ago, a Seventh Circuit en banc panel held oral arguments in Vance v. [read post]
