Search for: "State v. Sutton"
Results 581 - 600
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
But the injunction should only apply within the 14 plaintiff states. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:31 pm
Sutton’s article Is There a Doctor (And a Lawyer) In The House? [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
Michelle Sutton, an attorney and lobbyist at Capitol Resource Group, has compiled a list of some of the most important laws the Oklahoma Legislature passed in 2021. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
Michelle Sutton, an attorney and lobbyist at Capitol Resource Group, has compiled a list of some of the most important laws the Oklahoma Legislature passed in 2021. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
” United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
Sutton of Columbus, Ohio, nevertheless laid down a challenge for the Supreme Court to ponder when the controversy reached that level. “The Court,” he wrote, “should stop saying that a meaningful limit on Congress’s commerce powers exists or prove that it is so.” It is fairly easy to argue (though some do debate it) that the individual mandate is a proper policy initiative to test whether there is such a limit, because of its unique nature and… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 7:59 am
A silver medal goes to Michael's post on DeJohn v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
She expressly states he may have injured her, albeit innocently. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
On September 19, retired Justice David Souter shared the stage with Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Beyer was a speaker at the 51st Annual Fiduciary Law Institute sponsored by the State Bar of Georgia Institute of Continuing Legal Education. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am
”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
Sutton, and P.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
Imagine little Joe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]
