Search for: "State v. TM" Results 581 - 600 of 748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(IP Dragon) Bridgestone v Bull – prior design defence in China (Class 99) Yao Ming wants to reign supreme over Yao Ming era (IP Dragon) An SME handbook for China. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:43 am by Lara
That case, however, actually states: Nonetheless, EMI has not demonstrated that it has so strengthened its mark as to weigh this factor in favor of finding likely confusion. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:40 am by Eric
Selected prior blog posts on Lifestyle Lift: - Lifestyle Lift Settles NYAG Claim Over Fake Consumer Reviews - Lifestyle Lift Tries to Use TM Law to Shut Down User Discussions; Website Countersues for Shilling--Lifestyle Lift v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Orin Kerr: internal v. external perspectives. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am by Gordon Firemark
Fleischer appealed district court’s ruling that Fleischer held neither a valid copyright nor a valid TM in the Betty Boop character. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
KEYNOTE Introduced by Michael Carroll, Professor of Law and Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law Justin Hughes, Senior Advisor to the Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, Head of United States Delegation to the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Professor of Law at Yeshiva University Cardozo School of Law In Geneva, working on GRTKF: Genetic resources, traditional knowledge, and… [read post]