Search for: "State v. Toler" Results 581 - 600 of 3,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
In 2011, the government’s Prevent strategy defined extremism as the “active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and the mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs”. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:06 am by Andres
The balancing act can be seen in more detail in a series of decisions by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which start with Delfi v Estonia, and culminates with MTE v Hungary. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by John McFarland
Last Friday the Texas Supreme Court issued opinions in XOG Operating, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am by INFORRM
The Court first reiterated that Article 10 protects ‘expressive conduct’, including expressive conduct which offends, shocks or disturbs the State or ‘any section of the population’. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 11:07 am by Eugene Volokh
I encouraged her to write up a blog post, and she kindly passed along the following: In the November 9th oral argument for Haaland v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by George M. Wallace
Doudna states in his supporting affidavit that he did not write, post, or even read that report at the time. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The judge awarded Mr Monir £40,000 in damages and costs, and said in his judgment: “It needs to be stated clearly: Mr Monir is completely innocent. [read post]